AI assurance for regulated companies

Agents will do the work.
Someone still has to vouch for it.

Why now: In 2024, one attack on Change Healthcare exposed the health records of 193 million Americans. Cancer patients waited for their treatment to be approved. That was before agents.

SCV checks AI-written security work against written rules and keeps a record your customers can re-run themselves.

Built forHealth techPharmaFintechAccountingLaw
The problem

AI writes more changes every week. The person who checks them hasn't been cloned.

At a growing regulated company, one security person often carries the whole review queue. So the work either waits for weeks, or goes out unchecked.

PEOPLE
$178k

One security analyst for a year, with benefits. And they're hard to hire.

SOFTWARE
Documents

Compliance tools collect the evidence. They don't check whether the work behind it holds up.

SCANNERS
Known bugs

Tests, Snyk and Semgrep find known problems. Nothing checks that your safeguards are still there.

Why it's a problem

A LEAK

One unchecked change

A change quietly lets one customer see another's data. In healthcare that means patient records, a breach notice, and a customer who leaves.

A LOST DEAL

One wrong answer

A wrong answer on a security questionnaire surfaces in procurement. The deal stalls, or the answer becomes a promise nobody kept.

A FAILED AUDIT

No name on it

The auditor asks who approved a change and why. If no named person signed it, that's a finding, and the certificate your customers rely on is at risk.

Analyst cost: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics median wage, May 2024, adjusted for employer cost.

How it works

A gate, not a reviewer. Rules, not guesses.

Fixed rules you can read decide what ships. Anything risky waits for a person whose name goes on it.

Today

01AI writes a change
02Tests and scanners pass
03It goes live. Nobody checked the safeguards.

With SCV

01AI writes a change
02SCV's engine checks it against your rules
Safe: goes live
Risky: held for a person
03Every decision saved as a record
01

Same answer, every time

The same work gets the same result. No chatbot guessing.

02

A named person signs the risky ones

Routine work goes through by rules. Risky work waits, because an auditor needs a name on it.

03

A record anyone can re-run

Your customer or your auditor can check any decision again and get the same answer.

Why now
In 2024, one attack on Change Healthcare exposed the health records of 193 million people, more than half of all Americans. 74% of hospitals surveyed said it hurt patient care. Cancer patients waited for their treatment to be approved. That was before agents.

AI now writes code and answers security questions inside regulated companies. Customers check their vendors before they buy, and a wrong answer loses the deal. The work is moving to the agent. The liability isn't.

Sources: UnitedHealth Group (193M people, 2025); American Hospital Association survey of nearly 1,000 hospitals, March 2024; American Society for Radiation Oncology, 2024.

Book a call

20 minutes. Your review queue, not my slides.

If you carry security or compliance at a regulated company, I want to hear what you have to vouch for today.

  • Where the review work piles up
  • What your auditor or customers ask you to prove
  • Whether a gate like this would help, or wouldn't

Goes straight to Tamara Mustafaeva, the founder: 10+ years running large platforms at NBCUniversal / Peacock and fuboTV. No list, no sequence.